Birds of a Feather Flock Together: Experience-Driven Formation of Visual Object Categories in Human Ventral Temporal Cortex

The present functional magnetic resonance imaging study provides direct evidence on visual object-category formation in the human brain. Although brain imaging has demonstrated object-category specific representations in the occipitotemporal cortex, the crucial question of how the brain acquires this knowledge has remained unresolved. We designed a stimulus set consisting of six highly similar bird types that can hardly be distinguished without training. All bird types were morphed with one another to create different exemplars of each category. After visual training, fMRI showed that responses in the right fusiform gyrus were larger for bird types for which a discrete category-boundary was established as compared with not-trained bird types. Importantly, compared with not-trained bird types, right fusiform responses were smaller for visually similar birds to which subjects were exposed during training but for which no category-boundary was learned. These data provide evidence for experience-induced shaping of occipitotemporal responses that are involved in category learning in the human brain

Formation of category representations in superior temporal sulcus

Contains fulltext : 115473-OA.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)The human brain contains cortical areas specialized in representing object categories. Visual experience is known to change the responses in these category-selective areas of the brain. However, little is known about how category training specifically affects cortical category selectivity. Here, we investigated the experience-dependent formation of object categories using an fMRI adaptation paradigm. Outside the scanner, subjects were trained to categorize artificial bird types into arbitrary categories (jungle birds and desert birds). After training, neuronal populations in the occipito-temporal cortex, such as the fusiform and the lateral occipital gyrus, were highly sensitive to perceptual stimulus differences. This sensitivity was not present for novel birds, indicating experience-related changes in neuronal representations. Neurons in STS showed category selectivity. A release from adaptation in STS was only observed when two birds in a pair crossed the category boundary. This dissociation could not be explained by perceptual similarities because the physical difference between birds from the same side of the category boundary and between birds from opposite sides of the category boundary was equal. Together, the occipito-temporal cortex and the STS have the properties suitable for a system that can both generalize across stimuli and discriminate between them

Phonological encoding is not contingent on semantic feature retrieval : an electrophysiological study on object naming

Item does not contain fulltex

Selective representation of objects relevant for navigation

Contains fulltext : 17217.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access

Towards neurophysiological assessment of phonemic discrimination: Context effects of the mismatch negativity

Contains fulltext : 77251.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)Objective - This study focusses on the optimal paradigm for simultaneous assessment of auditory and phonemic discrimination in clinical populations. We investigated (a) whether pitch and phonemic deviants presented together in one sequence are able to elicit mismatch negativities (MMNs) in healthy adults and (b) whether MMN elicited by a change in pitch is modulated by the presence of the phonemic deviants. Methods - Standard stimuli [i] were intermixed with small, medium or large pitch deviants or with pitch deviants of the same magnitude together with small and large phonemic deviants, [y] and [u], respectively. Results - When pitch and phonemic deviants were presented together, only the large pitch and phonemic contrasts elicited significant MMNs. When only pitch deviants were presented, the medium and large pitch contrasts elicited significant MMNs. The MMNs, in response to the medium and large pitch contrasts, were of similar magnitude across the two contexts. Conclusions - Pitch and phonemic deviants can be tested together provided the pitch contrast is relatively large. Significance - A combined neurophysiological test of phonemic and pitch discrimination, as measured by the MMN, is a time-effective tool that may provide valuable information about the underlying cause of poorly specified phonemic representations in clinical populations.9 p